The Floater
  • The Floater April 2018
  • The Floater March 2018
  • The Floater February 2018
  • The Floater January 2018
  • The Floater December 2017
  • The Floater November 2017
  • The Floater October 2017
  • Floater September 2017
  • Floater August 2017
  • The Floater July 2017
  • The Floater June 2017
  • The Floater May 2017
  • The Floater April 2017
  • The Floater March 2017
  • The Floater February 2017
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Floater December 2016
  • Floater December Update
  • Floater November 2016
  • Floater October 2016
  • Floater September 2016
  • Floater August 2016
  • Floater July 2016
  • Floater June 2016
  • Floater May 2016
  • Floater April 2016
  • Floater April 2016 PAGE TWO
  • Floater March 2016
  • Floater February 2016
  • Floater January 2016
  • Most recent issues
  • Information
  • The Floater on Facebook and Twitter
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Link Page
  • The Floater January 2017

If you want less litter – the answer is fewer bins - apparently

21/6/2017

2 Comments

 
There is a big issue with the amount of litter discarded on towpaths, as any boater knows, and that is especially true in urban areas where C&RT has litter bins installed to encourage visitors to dispose of their rubbish properly. Yet the Trust is in the process of removing four in ten towpath bins, as Alec Wood reports.


It was back in April that the National Bargee Travellers Association challenged Canal & River Trust to produce research it said backed up its claim that taking away bins will reduce litter. Nearly two months later it still hasn't provided any research.


In the meeting between Canal & River Trust (C&RT) and the National Bargee Travellers Association (NBTA) London branch, C&RT said that they have a national plan to remove 40 per cent of litter bins from the towpaths in order to reduce litter. 
It plans to keep them in storage and only reinstate them if litter continues to be a problem.


Sam Thomas, C&RT's London Customer Operations Manager, said that “there is equal evidence for and against having less bins”. To date, he hasn't been able to share this evidence.


When replying to anti-litter campaign group, Keep Britain Tidy, C&RT had a different justification, blaming the 'mistreatment' of bins as a reason to remove them.


It said: "In London, a number of litter bins along the towpath were being mistreated and were being used by people to fly tip... This means the bins in question were overflowing... people walking along the towpath will have to carry their litter a little further to put it in a bin, or maybe even take it home…”.


However, the plan to remove 40 per cent of litter bins is a national policy, according to information given to the NBTA, not just a London policy, making it difficult to argue that the 'mistreatment' of litter bins in London is a good reason to take away bins nationally.


Yet, C&RT has already started removing litter bins. Two bins were removed in Cheshunt, in Hertfordshire, one of which was next to the permanent ice cream boat. Another bin has been taken from a busy picnic area in Hackney, East London.


Keep Britain Tidy called the move by C&RT 'concerning' and promised to take it up with the Trust.


Boaters report it is already a struggle to find litter bins on the towpath, particularly in west London, yet there’s never a shortage of litter, so it would be interesting to see what evidence C&RT has to support their view that fewer bins equals less litter.


London boaters have suggested that emptying the bins more often would solve any 'overflowing, issues, yet when questioned about the frequency at which bins are emptied, C&RT’s response stated “some daily, some weekly, some depend on season”. It is difficult to avoid the idea that a clear emptying policy might have been a better starting point than removing bins.


Marcus Trower, the Deputy Chair of the NBTA said: “When C&RT told us about their plans to take away 40 per cent of bins to reduce litter, I thought they were joking. Then to store them and put them back if it doesn't work, sounds like a kind of dance routine with bins:


“You put the bins in,
“You take the bins out,
“Store them for a bit,
“And then put them back again.


“This plan must be in C&RT's top 10 list of bad ideas. Think about the money C&RT will spend on this dead end plan. If the public have nowhere to put their litter, it will be thrown on the ground, get into the water and end up around our propellers. I hope C&RT has a serious rethink”.



2 Comments
Richard Hole
21/6/2017 15:56:54

Whoever dreamed this up probably thinks it is 'blue sky' thinking. It's not. I was contracting for a local authority that tried this approach thirty years ago. It doesn't work.
CRT need some management with experience of their area of responsibility.

Reply
Richard Elkan
25/6/2017 17:38:59

Unfortunately, Litter, like Graffiti, is generally tolerated by our society. Yes, we get outraged when we see litter and moan about CRT or local authorities not providing enough bins or not emptying them often enough. When we buy a can of drink, a hamburger or whatever, we need to be prepared to hang on to it till we find a bin or actually take it home with us. Its a combination of education, civic pride and (as a last resort) prosecution that, hopefully, will make a difference. I doubt that the removal of 40% of the towpath bins will have much effect. I am sure it will be impossible to quantify the effects.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Proudly powered by Weebly
✕