The Floater
  • The Floater November 2018
  • The Floater October 2018
  • The Floater September 2018
  • The Floater August 2018
  • The Floater July 2018
  • The Floater June 2018
  • The Floater May 2018
  • The Floater April 2018
  • The Floater March 2018
  • The Floater February 2018
  • The Floater January 2018
  • The Floater December 2017
  • The Floater November 2017
  • The Floater October 2017
  • Floater September 2017
  • Floater August 2017
  • The Floater July 2017
  • The Floater June 2017
  • The Floater May 2017
  • The Floater April 2017
  • The Floater March 2017
  • The Floater February 2017
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Floater December 2016
  • Floater December Update
  • Floater November 2016
  • Floater October 2016
  • Floater September 2016
  • Floater August 2016
  • Floater July 2016
  • Floater June 2016
  • Floater May 2016
  • Floater April 2016
  • Floater April 2016 PAGE TWO
  • Floater March 2016
  • Floater February 2016
  • Floater January 2016
  • Most recent issues
  • Information
  • The Floater on Facebook and Twitter
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Link Page
  • The Floater January 2017

Too many chiefs at C&RT?

14/3/2017

4 Comments

 
Allan Richards has been taking a look at the management costs of the National Trust and the Canal & River Trust and the ever-expanding top management of C&RT gives rise to some serious questions


Leaving aside its 11 trustees, why does Canal & River Trust (C&RT) have nine highly paid executive directors? In 2012, it only had six.

Now it has three more but it is difficult to see what has changed that increases the need for executive directors with remuneration packages ranging from over £100,000 to more than £200,000.

When British Waterways became C&RT back in 2012, six BW directors transferred to the new charity. They were Robin Evans (chief executive), Nigel Johnson (corporate services director), Stuart Mills (property & enterprise director) Vince Moran (technical & operations director), Philip Ridal  (finance director)  and Simon Salem (marketing director).

Five years on all but Stuart Mills have 'stepped down' taking with them substantial redundancy payments and pension entitlements. The latest, nine strong, executive team consists of Richard Parry (chief executive), Sandra Kelly (finance & corporate services director), Sophie Castell (marketing, communications and fundraising director), Mike Gooddie (human resources director), Stuart Mills, (job title now property director), Ian Rogers (customer services and operations director), Julie Sharman (asset management director), Simon Bamford (asset delivery director), Heather Clarke (strategy & planning director).
Picture
If one assumes that the functions of chief executive and property director have remained largely the same, we now have seven directors carrying out the functions performed by just four directors a few years previously.

Turning to the subject of remuneration, BW used to disclose details of all director's pay including bonus payments, benefits and bonuses in annual reports. Any information not disclosed could be obtained by request.


Unfortunately, C&RT only provide a subset of this information and refuse requests for further details.

C&RT was promoted as the new 'National Trust of the Waterways' thus positioning it alongside the National Trust as a charity protecting and maintain historic infrastructure. 

It is reasonable, therefore, to provide a comparison of number of staff that fall into pay bands above £100,000 for the two charities (figures taken from latest annual reports) -

                                                C&RT       NT
£100,001 - £110,000                1            2
£110,001 - £120,000                4            4
£120,001 - £130,000                1            0
£130,001 - £140,000                3            2
£140,001 - £150,000                3            0
£150,001 - £160,000                0            2
£160,001 - £170,000                0            3
£170,001 - £180,000                1            1
£180,001 - £190,000                1            0
£190,001 - £200,000                0            0
£200,001 - £210,000                1             0
£210,001 - £220,000                1             0

Total                                           16           14



NT has four times the employees of C&RT. Its income is well over two and a half times that of C&RT (despite not having the benefit of government grant and property portfolio).



Its membership figures, compared to C&RT's, speak for themselves. However, it manages to pay its executives less than C&RT and with its top earner being paid some £40,000 less than C&RT's top earner.

C&RT's first annual report does not provide a figure for key management personnel payments for 2012/13. However, with 11 staff, rather than 16, earning £1000,000+ it will have been significantly less.

There seems to be no logical reason why the number of 'chiefs' and 'high earners' has increased significantly over the five years of the trust's existence. 


However, the phrase 'too many chiefs, not enough Indians' appears to be only half vindicated because the number of Indians has risen as well!    


In 2012/13 C&RT employed 1,512. Just three years later, despite continuing outsourcing, the number has risen by 10 per cent to 1,660. Worse still, salary costs have jumped by an average of seven per cent each year since 2013 (£42.5m - £51.4m).

And they are still recruiting. Excluding 'chuggers' C&RT are currently advertising some 21 positions. These include some low paid customer facing roles. 



For example, a Waterway Operative on a starting salary of £16,471 (with progression) and a Seasonal Attractions Boat Master at £13,894 pro rata. 


Somewhat higher up in terms of salary but with less face to face customer contact we have -


  *   a Head of Boating up to £65,000 (with the advert claiming 37,000 boating customers instead of           32,000!),
  *   a PA to CEO Richard Parry at circa £36,000
  *   a 'Portfolio Manager' at circa £45,000
  *   a PA to director Simon Bamford circa £30,000
  *   a Community Delivery & Reporting Manager up to £42,000,
  *   a Development & Engagement Manager at circa £31.00
  *   a Principal Engineer (Bridges) at circa £45,000
  *   an Enterprise Manager at circa £42,000
  *   a Civil Engineer at circa £35,000

Perhaps it's a case of 'too many chiefs' requiring more Indians to justify their existence. 
​
Picture

    Have your say

Submit
4 Comments
Richard Hole
14/3/2017 08:33:38

You could go through the management and remove every third person, irrespective, and no-one would notice their going.

Reply
Eddie Boatie
14/3/2017 09:53:02

"All I want is less to do, more time to do it and more money for not getting it done " Springs to mind.

Reply
Mark Holdsworth link
16/3/2017 08:52:49

Why are these people paid so much money. I do not believe when it comes to something that is so close to the hearts of many people that this level of renumeration is required to attract the 'right' person!

Reply
M L
28/3/2017 16:38:26

How come they don't disclose full information? They are subject to Freedom of Information requests, being listed in Schedule I of the FOI Act (https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php/FOIA_Schedule_1_Part_VI#C) so if they fail to deliver this information, a complaint should be sent to the Information Commissioner's Office.

On another note, I do wish they paid the operatives more and the executives less. I wonder what those executives do all day... Tempted to apply for the PA role just to find out!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Writers

    Allan Richards has been reporting for The Floater since the start. He has a talent for digging through layers of officialese to reach the facts.
    Peter Underwood has written and edited The Floater from the beginning.
    Frank Sanderson is a long term suppoorter of the Lancaster Canal and promotes the restoration of the Northern Reache

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly