The Floater
  • The Floater November 2018
  • The Floater October 2018
  • The Floater September 2018
  • The Floater August 2018
  • The Floater July 2018
  • The Floater June 2018
  • The Floater May 2018
  • The Floater April 2018
  • The Floater March 2018
  • The Floater February 2018
  • The Floater January 2018
  • The Floater December 2017
  • The Floater November 2017
  • The Floater October 2017
  • Floater September 2017
  • Floater August 2017
  • The Floater July 2017
  • The Floater June 2017
  • The Floater May 2017
  • The Floater April 2017
  • The Floater March 2017
  • The Floater February 2017
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Floater December 2016
  • Floater December Update
  • Floater November 2016
  • Floater October 2016
  • Floater September 2016
  • Floater August 2016
  • Floater July 2016
  • Floater June 2016
  • Floater May 2016
  • Floater April 2016
  • Floater April 2016 PAGE TWO
  • Floater March 2016
  • Floater February 2016
  • Floater January 2016
  • Most recent issues
  • Information
  • The Floater on Facebook and Twitter
  • The Floater January 2017
  • Link Page
  • The Floater January 2017

Increase in performance failures 'satisfactory under the circumstances' claims C&RT

30/3/2018

6 Comments

 
​With C&RT's financial year ending, comes confirmation that the the charity will fail to achieve targets for at least six Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) . The first sign of failure was an admission, just four months into the new financial year, that the the Trust would be unable to meet its 2017/18 year end target of 28,500 'Friends'. Allan Richards takes a look at recently published figures that give the position as of January, some 10 months into C&RT's 2017/18 financial year. 

First up, a look at the problematic issue of 'Friends'. C&RT's aspiration was to recruit and retain 100,000 'Friends' over its first ten years. To achieve this, at the end of year six it should have about 60,000 'Friends'.

The target it set itself was rather more modest - just 28,500. However just four months into its sixth financial year it admitted that even 28,500 could not be achieved by year end. By the end of January its acheivement of 23,500 was still 5,000 short of its 28,500 target and and a massive 36,500 short of where it needs to be to recruit 100,000 over ten years. 

In financial terms, it means that, for the sixth year in a row, C&RT will make a loss on charitable giving. Hopefully, that loss will be slightly smaller than in past years. Taken together with C&RT's recent admission that none of its Waterways Partnerships had managed to obtain third party funding for their Three Year Plans, one is left wondering what the financial advantages of C&RT being a charity really are ...  

C&RT operates a traffic light system for measuring its KPI's against interim and year end targets -

    - Green indicates that the KPI is ahead of target
    - Yellow indicates that the KPI is behind target (possibly recoverable by year end)
    - Red indicates that the KPI target cannot be achieved (unrecoverable by year end)



'Friends' has been red since month 4. By month 10 another five KPI's had joined it -
'People aware of the Trust' is red with 36 per cent aware against a target of 40 per cent - together with the 'Friends KPI this is perhaps the reason for the much criticised rebranding, and certainly bad news if it wants to persuade government to part with more cash on the basis of the 'wellbeing' created in the general public by the waterways.

'Number of adoptions of C&RT's waterways (each adoption scheme roughly equates to 1 mile)' is also red - 205 against a target of 220. How many of these 205 adoptions are actually active?

'Diversity - percentage senior management female' is red - not only is the number less than target, it is also less than last year. The fall is disappointing bearing in mind the clean bill of health that C&RT gave itself on the gender pay gap (The C&RT bonus culture).

'£ million secured from restricted statutory and voluntary funding, philanthropic and individual giving and contributions in kind' is red. The January figure is £14.4m against a year end target of £21.9m and a previous year actual £25.9m.

Last but by no means least -
'Number of days of unplanned closures to navigation within our control (individual instances over 48 hours)' - C&RT give the month 10 figure as 458 days. This is  already greater than the 2017/18 target (400 days). No doubt it will be well over 500 by year end, especially with the breach at Middlewich.

Six KPI's in the red. The question is will the year end total be more. For that we have to look at yellow KPI's -


'Diversity - % staff BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic)' - here the month 10 figure of 4.6 per cent is not only below target of 5.0per cent but also below the previous year actual of 4.8 per cent.

'Number of volunteer hours per annum' is given as 489,794 against a year end target of 600,000.


Finally, 'Number of individual visitors to our waterways in typical two-week period (over last 12 months)'. This KPI is 4.4m against a target of 4.5m. By way of comparison BW's intention was 7.2m (including Scotland) by 2012.

So the big picture is that C&RT has already conceded that it will fail against six of its 2017/18 KPI's with no possibility of recovery. A further three were yellow in January with the possibility that year end KPI targets might not be achieved. For comparison, C&RT failed to achieve just three KPI's the previous year (2016/17).

Minutes of the board meeting on January 25 record 'The Trust’s Performance against KPIs is largely satisfactory in the circumstances'. However, it is unclear if this is the opinion of the Board, its Chief Executive Richard Parry or both. It is unclear what these circumstances are. 

Do they mean the self inflicted turmoil created by a reorganisation designed to cut costs by shedding senior staff and reversing the the centralisation policy of three years ago?
​

6 Comments
Alan Theaker
30/3/2018 17:03:53

Now why is it with all the paid for business consultant guidance C&RT continue to fail at reaching there own targets. They could quite easily fill their marinas to capacity by reducing their prices 50%. Could take in tens of £ks from November through to March with online winter mooring fees reduced to £10 wk opposed to marina rates & with four million plus annual towpath visitors could probably rake in another £100k if they want to discuss it with me. But why is it the obvious evades these supposed clever people.

Whistler nb Sawdust

Reply
Roger Abbott
31/3/2018 06:13:49

Seems to me that the biggest problem CRT have is down to the fact that they are obviously employing incompetent people at the top end of their organisation. If the upper management levels were actually capable of doing the jobs they are being paid large salaries, bonuses and all manner of benefits for there would be absolutely no reason to spend bloody fortunes on expensive and it would seem equally incompetent outside consultants ! What an utter shambles !

CRT - Not fit for purpose !

Reply
Brian D Jarrett
31/3/2018 06:40:44

“We need to pay these salaries in order to get the level of management we require”
BS it the management was capable of managing & running the Waterways they would not need to pursue the policy off utilising “Consultants”
Perhaps they should look closely at themselves !how about taking a leaf out of the early 70’s management book Up the Organisation
Stop trying to run the trust as if it is some Global Operation giving lengthy and obsured job titles
Such as :- “ Strategy and Engagement Manager”
or “Policy, Research & Impact Unit Manager”
What do these mean ?
Once again I reiterate “promoted to their point of incompetence.” The Peter Principle !

Reply
Alan Theaker
31/3/2018 14:51:21

One wonders why business consultants are'nt themselves CEO's of their own companies & I suppose it's the zero risk factor of telling someone else how to run theirs & they can't go wrong advising individuals that have not a clue as what is a good idea & what isn't co's it's no doubt written in the contract that the consultants are paid regardless of success or failure & of cause they'd get a cut of any savings they suggest wich are implemented. So with customers like Parry & Co they'r in a win win position. Lol

Reply
colin
31/3/2018 20:07:55

Take a look here:http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk/NewsAttachments/NST/Feat1PayStudy3.pdf
to see how self important these people believe they are!
Seems they believe they do a more important job than Barnardos,The National Trust,British heart Foundation,Macmillan Cancer Support...the list goes on!!!

Reply
Chris Morgan
2/7/2018 22:19:18

The Cart project has failed.
Failed the countrys waterways that are falling apart.
Failed their employees who have lost pay due to volunteers taking their overtime.
Failed the main customer and cash cow the boat owner.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    March 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly